How Neil Armstrong Trained to Land on the Moon - Smarter Every Day 250

30-Yan, 2021
1 366 119 Ko‘rishlar soni

Get 1st Audiobook + full access to the Plus Catalog for free when you try Audible for 30 days or TXT smarter to 500500
Click here if you're interested in subscribing:
⇊ Click below for more links! ⇊
A very special thank you to Wayne Ottinger
Check out the AMAZING website by Ben Feist that synchronizes all Apollo data:
I had to find a lot of archival footage to make this video. Thanks to Devin for helping me find the original Apollo LLTV footage from Ellington.
A special thank you to for providing the footage and audio of the Neil Armstrong Interview after flying the LLTV.
Tweet Ideas to me at:
Smarter Every Day on Facebook
Smarter Every Day on Patreon
Smarter Every Day On Instagram
Smarter Every Day SubReddit
Ambiance, audio and musicy things by: Gordon McGladdery
If you feel like this video was worth your time and added value to your life, please SHARE THE VIDEO!
If you REALLY liked it, feel free to pitch a few dollars Smarter Every Day by becoming a Patron.
Warm Regards,

  • We're going back to the moon, and we're going to need to train Astronauts how to land. This video is the result of trying to understand that control problem better. in the next video of this series, I'll show you footage from an actual NASA Lunar Lander software test I participated in many years ago. Also, I'd like to say express grateful I am to everyone who supports Smarter Every Day on Patreon at . If you've never considered being a Patreon of Smarter Every Day, then feel free to click the link if you'd like to see what it's all about. If not, then no big deal! I'm grateful that you're here. Warm Regards, Destin

    SmarterEveryDaySmarterEveryDay2 oy oldin
    • Great video!! Thanks! I am a physicist and not a spacecraft engineer, so maybe my question sounds strange to the engineering guys. What I am still curious is why the xy movement needs to be a component of total trust controlled by tilt of the entire lander. Why not tilting just the engine and keeping the lander stable? Then ~6x the tilt on the moon compared to earth. OR use multiple engines (front, back, left, right) to perform xy movement, without needing to tilt the lander or components after all. Curious about your comments! Cheers

      tomandlinotomandlino9 kun oldin
    • Hey Destin, great video. The video title currently says lading rather than landing.

      loejsheploejshep24 kun oldin
    • Yooo I used to watch and listen to the apollo synced timeline for hours on end, listening to everything unfold in real time. Its crazy to think that was their exact communication during the missions! So glad you know about that site!

      Ely KlenzakEly KlenzakOy oldin
    • mr.Destin, i have a question. lunar module weigh is about 15 tons. the lightest rocket i found is delta-2 with weight is about 150tons. if moon gravity is 1/6 of earth, then rocket may be 25 tons. but module must spend fuel to landing and to take of. so module weight must be is about 50tons. but real lunar module weight 15tons. how could it be?

      TiciusTiciusOy oldin
    • Pshhhhh old news. I could land on the moon.

      Gavin AndStuffGavin AndStuffOy oldin
  • 1:58 amongus

    Davide PiovaniDavide PiovaniKun oldin
  • 1:59 AMOGUS

    Michael KernMichael KernKun oldin
  • 1:45 AMOGUS

    Michael KernMichael KernKun oldin
  • I think the early "control system engineers" are better than now, with limited literary and material resources, they have to solve physics, chemical problems, first formulate systems in calculus, then translate in machine language code, write them in the brain of mechanical-electronic systems that very complex they build, they must master the knowledge all at once

    D DiverD DiverKun oldin
  • It's amazing a masterpiece like this video has received such quantity of dislikes...

    Mauro CoimbraMauro Coimbra2 kun oldin
  • Gravity is a push not a pull.

    Christian RehtorikChristian Rehtorik3 kun oldin
  • 1:45 among us

    Harry XHarry X3 kun oldin
  • 1:45 mogus?

    N1k0N1k03 kun oldin
  • Now that NASA selected a HLS to land on the moon for Artemis 3 a followup video would be great!

    BrixxterBrixxter4 kun oldin
  • Someone please do that cartoon!

    Attila BódiAttila Bódi7 kun oldin
  • Moon landing was fake

    H HabibH Habib10 kun oldin
    • Wrong

      AtlasAtlas5 kun oldin
  • I want to know if any simulator game has this thing in it

    Antonio HernandezAntonio Hernandez11 kun oldin
  • The LLRF frame is still there about 10 minutes from me.

    Mark VanRaamMark VanRaam11 kun oldin
  • I really respect you destin

    Mike MantheMike Manthe15 kun oldin
  • 15:10 like why they used 2 different CO2 filters

    jamcdonald120jamcdonald12016 kun oldin
  • 1:55 and that is what kerbal space program is for ;)

    jamcdonald120jamcdonald12016 kun oldin
  • Neil never went to the moon Truth will come out sooner or later

    MUlises PHuertaMUlises PHuerta17 kun oldin
  • NASA is not going back to the moon. China might and SpaceX might but not NASA. NASA has become so mired in bureaucracy and waste that it has been going backward for decades. They don't design engines anymore and they don't do manned flights anymore. This is the nature of government.

    Niko942Niko94220 kun oldin
    • @Niko942 my bad I thought you were saying the landings were fake. I however do not suffer any such ailments as being addicted to the dreaded NBC Narrative or cognitive dissonance. I’m 53, I’ve seen plenty, as you do if you grow up on the ‘wrong side of tracks’.

      nicsandee123nicsandee1239 kun oldin
    • @nicsandee123 If you think about it you'll see that cognitive dissonance can't affect just anyone, it can only affect those whose perceptions are largely false. If you're able to correctly understand what happens in the world, then there simply won't be a disagreement between facts and what you already know. However I have no idea why you're talking about 'hoaxers'. No one in this thread has mentioned any kind of hoaxes, except you.

      Niko942Niko9429 kun oldin
    • @Niko942 you know that cognitive dissonance works both ways right? It has no bias, so it could be you that suffers from that most heinous of ailments? Every wonder why hoaxers keep harping on about shadows yet you can prove all that nonsense is wrong in your own back yard? Or better still find a piece of waste ground that catches the afternoon sun, bring a shovel, some rocks and a camera. It’s easy to do. So if one of the key elements of the hoax is the photographs and the shadows but yet it is utter nonsense, why should anyone listen to or place any credence on the rest of it? Food for thought perhaps?

      nicsandee123nicsandee1239 kun oldin
    • @Atlas You see, you have no idea why you support what you support. You have no logical backing, no historical evidence, no moral justification. You just repeat whatever position the media tells you to and anyone who disagrees you turn to insults and empty posturing. I never said "taxation is theft" those are your words, not mine. By reducing to a meme, you tell yourself that you don't need to look at facts or evidence or even morality.

      Niko942Niko94216 kun oldin
    • @Niko942 Are you still going on about this? It's over, dude. You think taxation is theft. That's beyond stupid. You lost, homie. Go home.

      AtlasAtlas16 kun oldin
  • 1:49 - 1:55 I don't see why this is important... 😕

    Boba FettBoba Fett24 kun oldin
  • "moon lading"

    Hack HairHack Hair24 kun oldin
  • The auspicious damage anatomically store because jeans apparently charge excluding a hurt magazine. diligent, cagey blow

    Dorothy MilesDorothy Miles25 kun oldin
  • Just finished Mike Collins audiobook, it was great!

    Dan M StudiosDan M Studios28 kun oldin
  • What if I Were My Dog and My Dog Were Me? Designed to assist young writers in learning during the pandemic! Margaret Van Fleet.

    Rya LeeRya LeeOy oldin
  • You Tube are ramming their ads in all over the place. Such as, in the middle of critical statements or information.

    SmachfestSmachfestOy oldin
    • ublock origin 😉

      AtlasAtlas25 kun oldin
  • Smarter every day? Seriously? Have you looked at that paper, curtain rod and masking tape Lunar lander? You REALLY believe that pile of junk landed on the moon? Dumber every day should be your channel name, sorry.

    Swilliam sonofhenrySwilliam sonofhenryOy oldin
    • Wrong.

      AtlasAtlasOy oldin

    monkey skinmonkey skinOy oldin
  • This could explain some of the "UFO's" that have been seen just floating in place. I mean the government is 30 years ahead of what we know, admitted by the FBI or CIA. It was one of them, but I do remember talking about this in class at the University. Edit: Not sure about the crafts flying over 5000 mph and turning at basically 90 degrees.

    Rock HashRock HashOy oldin
  • is my memory tricking me or has the title changed at least twice?

    AlluriAlluriOy oldin
    • I believe it has

      AtlasAtlasOy oldin
  • Complete nonsense.

    Daniel M ConnollyDaniel M ConnollyOy oldin
    • wrong

      AtlasAtlasOy oldin
  • The one pail proportionately glow because hurricane notably knock within a enormous jogging. glossy, third geranium

    Omar SalihOmar SalihOy oldin
  • How My Drone Landed on the Moon - Pitty the Camera Broke Down Half Way - I Pointed It into The Sun...

    Voor NaamVoor NaamOy oldin
  • 1:58 sus ⁉️⁉️⁉️

    Comrade Polar bearComrade Polar bearOy oldin
  • Plot twist....they don't

    Pat* DarkoPat* DarkoOy oldin
    • Yawn.

      E. RoseE. RoseOy oldin
  • "are you Nasa? call me."

    Daniel RichardsDaniel RichardsOy oldin
  • This might be a stupid idea, but these days couldn't we, in theory, build a drone 1/6th the mass of a lunar lander then use virtual or augmented reality to put the pilot in the seat of that drone?

    RichJMoneyRichJMoneyOy oldin
    • @Atlas yes but the counter thruster offsets an amount of WEIGHT, which you can also do by... reducing the weight. Acceleration due to gravity is constant but how it flies is based on the overall MASS vs the force of the thrusters.

      RichJMoneyRichJMoneyOy oldin
    • heavy things freefall as fast as light things.

      AtlasAtlasOy oldin
  • Taco bell

    Nota NoobNota NoobOy oldin
  • I disagree with Mr. Ottinger that we won't go without training on an LLTV. China recently sent an unmanned flight to the moon and it landed and took off without a human pilot. The computers we have nowadays are good enough to input the Gs, and land without any experience whatsoever by themselves. I would be completely shocked if we even bothered putting a man on another LLTV ever again. I go think though that it could be useful for testing the autonomous landing of the crafts we build in the future, for both the moon and for Mars, thought I can understand why they didn't do it for the sky crane concept that placed perseverance on Mars. It still landed safely without that didn't it? Within 5 meters of it's intended landing spot.

    JathTechJathTechOy oldin
  • I love Destins videos, but a VTOL jet in the 60s isn't amazing. The Harrier Jump Jet took its first flight in like 1967.

    MW DouglasMW DouglasOy oldin
  • 10:22 Wow after seeing that ejection seat I had to look it up. They pull 12-14g :O :O

    Justice SportsmanJustice SportsmanOy oldin
  • We couldn’t have Accomplish these in the past without a patriotic mindset. People pull back and tiptoe around projects based on saying or doing something that might offend another person, so people withdraw from the project! If cancel culture doesn’t stop we will be at the real country in no time. With the New World order will be the THIRD WORLD ORDER!

    HAUNEBU 2HAUNEBU 2Oy oldin
  • That clip of the bail out was terrifying.

    Karim El HayawanKarim El HayawanOy oldin
  • Youre a beast .

    MathrMathrOy oldin
  • 0:36 They don't.

    Just Another GuyJust Another GuyOy oldin
  • If he says the moon landing was real I believe it 😂

    OZZY xKCOZZY xKCOy oldin

    Diogo Brito e FaroDiogo Brito e FaroOy oldin
  • That was awesome. Please keep reaching back in time to speak to the scientists and engineers that got us where we are. Thank you.

    Ken BengtsonKen BengtsonOy oldin
  • I'm so glad I watched this. For years, I've always thought that Neil's crash with the LLTV was caused by pilot error and that, in general, they hated the LLTV. I always had the belief from information I gathered through various articles and docs that the LLTV was useless and couldn't adequately train them for lunar landing. Wow, what an eye opening video.

    Elliot SElliot SOy oldin
  • For real were you go my son and me love getting smarter everyday

    albert pearsonalbert pearsonOy oldin
  • I got completely distracted when you broke out the lunar lander shot glass. PS if it's not a lunar lander shot glass I now reserve the rights for them

    Mark_ _WhitfieldMark_ _WhitfieldOy oldin
  • 11:17 I’ve never seen a luggage tractor going so fast in my lifetime

    Mikey 101234Mikey 101234Oy oldin
  • A great book about the engineering aspects of the Apollo program is “Angle of Attack: Harrison Storms and the Race to the Moon” by Mark Gray. As an engineer you’ll love it. I read it in my history of technology class for my mechanical engineering undergrad.

    DathanielDathanielOy oldin
  • 1:45 ⠀⠀⠀⡯⡯⡾⠝⠘⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⢊⠘⡮⣣⠪⠢⡑⡌ ⠀⠀⠀⠟⠝⠈⠀⠀⠀⠡⠀⠠⢈⠠⢐⢠⢂⢔⣐⢄⡂⢔⠀⡁⢉⠸⢨⢑⠕⡌ ⠀⠀⡀⠁⠀⠀⠀⡀⢂⠡⠈⡔⣕⢮⣳⢯⣿⣻⣟⣯⣯⢷⣫⣆⡂⠀⠀⢐⠑⡌ ⢀⠠⠐⠈⠀⢀⢂⠢⡂⠕⡁⣝⢮⣳⢽⡽⣾⣻⣿⣯⡯⣟⣞⢾⢜⢆⠀⡀⠀⠪ ⣬⠂⠀⠀⢀⢂⢪⠨⢂⠥⣺⡪⣗⢗⣽⢽⡯⣿⣽⣷⢿⡽⡾⡽⣝⢎⠀⠀⠀⢡ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⢂⠢⢂⢥⢱⡹⣪⢞⡵⣻⡪⡯⡯⣟⡾⣿⣻⡽⣯⡻⣪⠧⠑⠀⠁⢐ ⣿⠀⠀⠀⠢⢑⠠⠑⠕⡝⡎⡗⡝⡎⣞⢽⡹⣕⢯⢻⠹⡹⢚⠝⡷⡽⡨⠀⠀⢔ ⣿⡯⠀⢈⠈⢄⠂⠂⠐⠀⠌⠠⢑⠱⡱⡱⡑⢔⠁⠀⡀⠐⠐⠐⡡⡹⣪⠀⠀⢘ ⣿⣽⠀⡀⡊⠀⠐⠨⠈⡁⠂⢈⠠⡱⡽⣷⡑⠁⠠⠑⠀⢉⢇⣤⢘⣪⢽⠀⢌⢎ ⣿⢾⠀⢌⠌⠀⡁⠢⠂⠐⡀⠀⢀⢳⢽⣽⡺⣨⢄⣑⢉⢃⢭⡲⣕⡭⣹⠠⢐⢗ ⣿⡗⠀⠢⠡⡱⡸⣔⢵⢱⢸⠈⠀⡪⣳⣳⢹⢜⡵⣱⢱⡱⣳⡹⣵⣻⢔⢅⢬⡷ ⣷⡇⡂⠡⡑⢕⢕⠕⡑⠡⢂⢊⢐⢕⡝⡮⡧⡳⣝⢴⡐⣁⠃⡫⡒⣕⢏⡮⣷⡟ ⣷⣻⣅⠑⢌⠢⠁⢐⠠⠑⡐⠐⠌⡪⠮⡫⠪⡪⡪⣺⢸⠰⠡⠠⠐⢱⠨⡪⡪⡰ ⣯⢷⣟⣇⡂⡂⡌⡀⠀⠁⡂⠅⠂⠀⡑⡄⢇⠇⢝⡨⡠⡁⢐⠠⢀⢪⡐⡜⡪⡊ ⣿⢽⡾⢹⡄⠕⡅⢇⠂⠑⣴⡬⣬⣬⣆⢮⣦⣷⣵⣷⡗⢃⢮⠱⡸⢰⢱⢸⢨⢌ ⣯⢯⣟⠸⣳⡅⠜⠔⡌⡐⠈⠻⠟⣿⢿⣿⣿⠿⡻⣃⠢⣱⡳⡱⡩⢢⠣⡃⠢⠁ ⡯⣟⣞⡇⡿⣽⡪⡘⡰⠨⢐⢀⠢⢢⢄⢤⣰⠼⡾⢕⢕⡵⣝⠎⢌⢪⠪⡘⡌⠀ ⡯⣳⠯⠚⢊⠡⡂⢂⠨⠊⠔⡑⠬⡸⣘⢬⢪⣪⡺⡼⣕⢯⢞⢕⢝⠎⢻⢼⣀⠀ ⠁⡂⠔⡁⡢⠣⢀⠢⠀⠅⠱⡐⡱⡘⡔⡕⡕⣲⡹⣎⡮⡏⡑⢜⢼⡱⢩⣗⣯⣟ ⢀⢂⢑⠀⡂⡃⠅⠊⢄⢑⠠⠑⢕⢕⢝⢮⢺⢕⢟⢮⢊⢢⢱⢄⠃⣇⣞⢞⣞⢾ ⢀⠢⡑⡀⢂⢊⠠⠁⡂⡐⠀⠅⡈⠪⠪⠪⠣⠫⠑⡁⢔⠕⣜⣜⢦⡰⡎⡯⡾⡽

    Kaden McentireKaden McentireOy oldin
  • I could not stop smiling at how excited Destin looks, when speaking to Mr. Wayne Ottinger. That was amazing.

    SkegonSkegonOy oldin
  • I don't understand why your videos get dislikes..

    mayur shastrimayur shastriOy oldin
  • The crooked random behaviourally jam because pest coincidently discover between a grubby gruesome cappelletti. grubby gruesome, standing bay

  • Awesome video.

    Michael KerrMichael KerrOy oldin
  • 5:40 VTOL was in relative terms extremely common for test technology in the late 50s and 60s, with Americans, British and Soviets having test aircraft at about the same time. Surprisingly, the West Germans had the best test vehicles for VTOL, one of them being a cargo aircraft.

    Top SecretTop SecretOy oldin
  • 1:43 Among Us?!?!?!?! 😳

    SaghettiSaghettiOy oldin
    • I deleted it

      Primal lump pumpPrimal lump pumpOy oldin
    • I just commented that I swear i didnt see yours first

      Primal lump pumpPrimal lump pumpOy oldin
  • we going to the moon again !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Thomas JohnsonThomas JohnsonOy oldin
  • Best way is: No human hands allowed! We can already land or fly anything better by computer than by hand, even the specialized ones.

    Marco MendonçaMarco MendonçaOy oldin
  • 1:45 - Amungus 1:59 - Amungus

    Communist CuberCommunist CuberOy oldin
  • Wayne Ottinger is too humble (in regards to engineers of the past).... IMHO (i'm a computer/software engineer) engineers from decades past that's specialized in a certain field needed to be well versed in the complementary fields as well, IE: Software/Computer with electrical, mechanical, materials engineering. I find that today the engineering practices are too hyper focused & more study into the complementary fields would not only move our technology forward faster & with increased quality, but also at a better cost for society as a whole...... The more I study & tinker in the electrical & materials engineering side of things, it's made me a better engineer 10x **** rant over ****

    John HJohn HOy oldin
  • why didn't they just use helium balloons???? get me a job at NASA stat!

    J. BJ. BOy oldin
  • Destin: "among us" 12 year olds: _suppressed laughter_

    mfaizsyahmi.mfaizsyahmi.Oy oldin
    • lol

      Heber RodriguezHeber RodriguezOy oldin
  • 1:45 A MONGUS!!

    XinanXinanOy oldin
  • A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon.

    Love SupremeLove SupremeOy oldin
  • 1:58 Amogus

    IMayHaveNukesIMayHaveNukesOy oldin
  • You are one smart dude, there is no doubt, and I love your videos. You posses a very down to earth way of explaining topics that is very appealing. But, I want to offer some friendly advice on the use of the phrase "for free". You cannot give or get something "for free". Inserting the word "for" implies that you have something called "free" that you can give or get in exchange for something. So, first you have to give or get something called "free" before the transaction can take place. Can't be done. The proper way to phrase it would be to simply say "I'm giving you something "free". It's proper and it sounds correct, because it is. Growing up in a family full of teachers has made it impossible for me to let this egregious misuse of the phrase impossible to ignore. However, nearly everyone misuses it, so don't feel too bad. :-} Next up will be my rant on the overuse of the word "basically", which basically has no basic meaning and is nothing more than a basic filler word. There, I feel much better now... Hey, maybe I should start a channel of my own.

    David TowerDavid TowerOy oldin
  • I love how some people are commenting that humans never went to space on other's comments, and not commenting directly. Cuz they don't have the courage to and in their heart they know they are wrong😂 but won't accept cuz they don't want to and look stupid in front of others😂

  • 1:45 sus

    Some weirdoSome weirdoOy oldin
  • Great video, great to hear from Mr. Ottinger

    GiuseppeSanGiuseppeSanOy oldin
  • 1:44 amogus

    Emil PEmil POy oldin
  • The flimsy asphalt wessely depend because country extracellularly scorch pro a tidy mom. tired, youthful dust

    Naveen ParaparanNaveen ParaparanOy oldin
  • This was fascinating.

    Test TestTest TestOy oldin
  • Thanks for the great video! I work on HLS and our CE recommended this LOL

    Alexandra ToftulAlexandra ToftulOy oldin
  • 3:20 nice tracking Destin!

  • But if NASA can program a robot to drop another robot on Mars all on its own. Why do astronauts need to land on the moon on their own? Is it not safer to use the programming? No atmosphere seems like it would create a very consistent and reliable medium to program for, then you don't need to add the possibility of human error in landing.

    Joe O'ConnorJoe O'ConnorOy oldin
    • Ammmm... 1969

      DankoDankoOy oldin
    • Yes, but robots aren't as good as humans yet.

      StormCrownStormCrownOy oldin
  • If i recall correctly wasn't the Harrier also flying the late 60's?

    TheSharko123TheSharko123Oy oldin
  • 1:58 Whaaaaa?

    Ean EEan EOy oldin
  • I wish the U.S still strived to be #1 and invest money into space rather then using our tax dollars to give other countries welfare all the time. It's a shame to think about how far ahead we would be if we were isolationist and reinvested our own money into our own economy.

    Sunken SlinkySunken SlinkyOy oldin
  • You should have worn an omega speedmaster motm

    Jamane Ma Raas HollingtonJamane Ma Raas HollingtonOy oldin
    • Great video

      Jamane Ma Raas HollingtonJamane Ma Raas HollingtonOy oldin
  • Silly. That can’t land on the moon. Flat Earth Baby

    Jeremiah JohnstonJeremiah JohnstonOy oldin
    • dummy

      AtlasAtlasOy oldin
  • Neil Armstrong... Boiler Up!!

    Lukas SmithLukas SmithOy oldin
  • Imagine if they had Kerbal Space Program back then.

    Notable DiscomfortNotable DiscomfortOy oldin
  • 1:45

    DizziDizziOy oldin
  • Incredible stuff. A truly great group of minds. You will never be thanked enough, Mr. Armstrong. Rest peacefully among the stars.

    Michael BMichael BOy oldin
  • You should continue your playlist on lawn tools do an episode on rotary hedge trimmers

    Josh LounsberryJosh LounsberryOy oldin
  • Every day...

    gamblergamblerOy oldin
  • Please get Michael Collins and Buzz Aldrin together.

    Ankur DebbarmaAnkur DebbarmaOy oldin
  • Destin got hold of a LEGEND.

    Ankur DebbarmaAnkur DebbarmaOy oldin
  • I tried to watch this with a straight face, but I simply cannot!

    Matthew SikoraMatthew SikoraOy oldin
  • wtheck UZworld. why you hide Dustin update from my subs page? Luckily I search smarterEveryDay out of curiosity.

    flameceoflameceoOy oldin
  • Goes to show you how much we take all of the technical tools for granted. I imagine engineers will pre-program all of the error correction techniques in a computer for the re-return, but the Apollo crew never had that. They had to do everything with mechanics and training. I think it will be much less of a technical challenge on each individual person, but still a staggering engineering feat overall.

    Some CanineSome CanineOy oldin
  • Thank you, what a very interesting and informative video

    Gratten JenkinsGratten JenkinsOy oldin
  • how much would be saved in fuel weight if the rocket first stage was accelerated on a maglev ramp before first stage engine ignition? seems like maglev trains are similar sizable payload can be accelerated to high speeds using electricity and starting a rocket to escape velocity from maglev speeds would have a huge impact compared to starting from a standstill

    sterlingwulf RBLXsterlingwulf RBLXOy oldin
  • Can you do a video on the “ Tennis Racquet Theorem” aka “Dzhanibekov Effect”

    Drunk AstronautDrunk AstronautOy oldin
  • Someone get Mr Ottinger's half burnt snake cartoon made.

    LoungeActVideosLoungeActVideosOy oldin
  • I absolutely love this video!! My Grandfather was a Quality Control Engineer with NASA and worked on every APOLLO mission!! My Grandfather oversaw the manufacture and installation of the battery systems of the lunar lander! A secret my Grandfather told me before he passed afew years back was. Before they affixed the housing of the batteries, my Grandfather and his crew had a bronze plaque made with their names inscibed on it. They attached it to the top of the housing that covered the batteries!!!! This could have caused a mass firing event if they were caught!!! So now my Grandfather's name is on the moon! This I am very proud of! Just thought you might like to hear the story.

    Brian HuntingtonBrian HuntingtonOy oldin
  • to land on the moon you have to buy AMC and GME

    Shawn HunterShawn HunterOy oldin